One of the decisions the Trump government is contemplating may transform the American technology sector. Officials are even considering purchasing a 10% share in one of the most significant chipmakers of America: The Intel Company, provided it is accepted, this will leave the U.S. government as one of the biggest stockholders of Intel. This step would represent an extraordinary intervention which is only common during the periods of war or financial crisis. According to reports, the thought of a $1 billion transfer revenue surfaced after the Intel CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, met administration officials in the White House last week. This is among the lines that President Trump had earlier demanded tan to step aside as a result of his links with business in China. Tan has bought into Chinese technological businesses in the form of a venture fund and one of his former firms was penalized in violation of the United States export regulations.


Chips Act Funds to Stock Equivalents
A possible deal on the table would turn the estimated 8bn USD of aid Intel can claim through the 2022 chips and science act into equity. The government would take an equity interest in the company instead of delivering subsidies directly in the company in the form of government funds. This would enable Washington to have greater control in future decision making at Intel and will also stabilize its investment in the growth of the firm. In the event of this deal coming to pass it would be one of the biggest government interventions into the U.S. industry since the financial crisis of 2008 where the government bailed out key banks and auto companies.
The importance of Intel
Intel is an essential manufacturer in the international chip market, yet the corporation has failed to match the competition posed by other companies like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (TSMC). TSMC has risen to be the global leader in advanced chips, with Intel experiencing production delays, losses and management changes. The second quarter of 2025 then reported a net loss of $2.9 billion by Intel, as the trend goes down, it dismissed its past chief executive towards the end of last year and has been unable to regain the confidence of investors. A recent investment of $2 billion by the Japanese soft bank has helped give Intel a slight uplift in fortune, but this has not been sufficient to modify the long-run situation of the firm. Supporting Intel is considered to be a matter of strategic need. The U.S. does not want to depend too much on TSMC, which might be subject to political tensions in China and Taiwan. Washington is aiming to domestically produce chips, which are important to the defence technology and manufacturing sectors, thereby cementing the position of Intel.
Trump’s Broader Industrial Policy
This possible shareholding in Intel is one aspect of a very large trend. President Trump seems to be strangely combative in defining the future of American industry since his re-election to the office. Previously, this year, his government took over a golden share in the U.S. Steel following an investment by Nippon Steel; such a stake provided the U.S. with the vetoing power concerning crucial decisions made by the corporation. Trump also agreed with Nvidia and AMD that they would pay 15% of their Chinese revenue to the U.S.. In exchange, they would be subject to export license to add to that he has threatened an increase of a 100% tariff on non-American made chips which indicates his intentions to bring more production of technology back to the country. This strategy is a combination of protectionism and involvement of the government. According to its admirers, it is justified by national security reasons and job security. It may be too much and frighten the private investors, critics respond.
The Legal and Industry Barriers to Follow
Reaching an Intel deal will not be easy, even in case the administration is determined to go that route any interest on the part of the government would require that it be approved by the board of directors of Intel and might be opposed by the shareholders or other regulators in the industry. Some investors might perceive the move as interference with politics as opposed to good business practice. This is however not the first time that history has witnessed the government intervening in times of crisis. In 2008, companies such as General Motors and Chrysler were rescued through an auto industry bailout. According to its proponents the future of Intel is also a matter of significance as far as the security and economy of the country is concerned and thus the intervention of the government is required.
A Roll of the Die
A U.S interest in Intel is not just a monetary question; it points out to the increasing awareness that semiconductors are as essential as oil or steel used to be in their day. Domination of chips is now found to be the thrust of economic and military power. In case the Trump administration proceeds, it will mark a new dawn where the government is more involved in the development of the tech industry. It is not clear whether this can serve to get Intel back on its feet or introduce some new risks but the stakes are as high as it can be imagined.
Discover more from Being Shivam
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.