The report, which was released by the Select Committee on China of the U.S. House of Representatives, pointed out the failures and inconsistencies in the export control regulations that enabled Chinese companies to purchase advanced equipment by foreign manufacturers, purchases which were not allowed in the U.S. according to its existing regulations.
The discovery has brought Washington back to its fears that the growing technological self-sufficiency of China may be a threat to the U.S. dominance in such vital areas as artificial intelligence, defence, and advanced manufacturing. Policymakers are now demanding broader and more concerted prohibitions of allies of the U.S. to seal gaps and make limitations effective.
The Chinese Purchasing Scale
The report submitted by the committee has shown that the value of Chinese chipmaking tools purchased by the Chinese chipmakers increased by 66% in 2024 in comparison to 2022, when most of the export restrictions were initially introduced.
These sales had a figure estimated to be around 39% of the worldwide sales of the five main manufacturers of semiconductor equipment: Applied Materials, Lam Research, KLA, ASML and Tokyo Electron.
Though the sales were not illegal, the swell in the transaction was used to point out the fact that the Chinese companies could still obtain high-end technology using the help of suppliers located in allied countries such as Japan and the Netherlands.
The countries have enacted their own regulations regarding exports of chipmaking, but the inability to align them with the policies of the U.S. has left loopholes which have been used by the Chinese companies.
Lack of Coherence in Rules between Allies
The report indicated that three major participants in semiconductor manufacturing, such as the United States, Japan and the Netherlands, have their own individual restrictions on exports. These rules are, however, different in scope and enforcement.
To illustrate, certain Japanese and Dutch firms have been able to sell some of their tools to Chinese manufacturers, whilst the U.S. firms have not been allowed to do so. This disproportional strategy has undermined the efficiency of the totality of the restrictions, as China is able to keep advancing its chipmaking capacity.
Both the Republicans and Democrats in the legislature have now called on the American government to collaborate more with cronies to harmonise the policies and to ensure that sophisticated production tools do not find their way into China.
The committee noted that it is solely a concerted, holistic strategy that would prevent China from developing an advantage in vital semiconductor technologies.
Reactions in the Industry and Falling Sales
Although the Chinese purchases have reached a new high recently, it is showing early indicators that the sales will start to decrease. Mark Dougherty, the president of the U.S. unit of Tokyo Electron, alleged that the company has experienced a reduction in sales to China this year, in part because of new export laws.
He was also open to increased collaboration between Washington and Tokyo regarding semiconductor policy, and he mentioned that enhanced harmonisation could be used to develop a clearer and more equitable set of policies in the sector as a whole. The U.S. has an unmet yet desired outcome, according to Dougherty of Reuters.
ASML and KLA refused to comment on the report, and Applied Materials and Lam Research refused to comment. Nevertheless, all the companies were said to collaborate with the congress investigation and were notified of the findings of the committee.
Security Issue with Chinese Chipmakers
The committee offered three Chinese companies as of particular concern, including SwaySure Technology Co, Shenzhen Pengxinxu Technology Co and SiEn Qingdao Integrated Circuits Co.
Lawmakers suspect such companies to belong to a shadowy network that assists Huawei Technologies. This Chinese technology firm, U.S officials have long accused of being a threat to national interests.
These companies were also included in the U.S. list of export blocklist last year due to the concerns of the lawmakers who noted that they might engage in assisting Huawei to procure limited technologies.
The new report suggests further tightening the restrictions to such an extent that it would cover not just the full equipment in the making of chips but even the smaller parts that China may utilise to construct its own equipment within the country.
The Larger Strategic Battle
What is even more than economic rivalry is geopolitical overture. Advanced semiconductors are considered a key to technological innovation and national defence in the United States. Washington wants to have a strategic advantage over Beijing in artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and next-generation military systems by keeping a tight rein on access to the most sophisticated chipmaking capabilities.
On its part, Craig Singleton, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, stated that China is currently attempting to establish a global chip supply chain to its own advantage. Singleton cautioned that China is trying to recreate the whole chain of supply. What once were niches in the tools segment are now warring grounds.
His words echo the rising alarm that China is fast catching up with technological development, and its development may alter the world order to the frontline not only economically, but also politically and even militarily.
The Path Forward
The report by the committee advises the Biden administration and its supporters to shift from company-specific bans to sector-wide ones. This would hinder the capacity of Chinese companies to find loopholes and to acquire the technology needed to make advanced chips.
These steps will likely face resistance from the semiconductor industry, which depends heavily on international sales as a way to fund innovation. To most equipment manufacturers, China still stands out as a huge source of income despite the risks and geopolitical tensions associated with it.
As a result, balancing national security needs and economic facts in the present circumstances is a daunting challenge to policymakers.
Assumption
The case with semiconductor equipment exports is the one that symbolises a larger struggle between the two countries, the United States and China, over technological superiority. In the process of pursuing its strategic industries and trying to warn against the usage of its technology in military or spying purposes, Washington continues to spend heavily on achieving technological self-sufficiency.
Currently, lawmakers are pushing towards the increased integration of the allied states and more restrictive measures that aim to prevent the possibility of China outmatching them in the ultimate technology race.
The effectiveness of these efforts will be determined not only by the will of the politicians but also by the willingness of the United States and its allies to introduce a well-built global technology-control system.
The semiconductor arena is quickly becoming the battle line of the bigger conflict over future control in the world, as both companies push up their respective stances.
Discover more from Being Shivam
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.