Apple’s M5 Chip On-Device AI is Competitive Moat, Not Consumer Benefit 

Apple’s new M5 chip is four times faster than the M4 at running AI tasks, thanks to the special “neural engines” built right into each GPU core. It can handle AI completely on the device, rather than sending data to the clouds, which sounds like a big win for the users. But it actually makes users even more dependent on Apple’s hardware than they have been on its software. 

Every such improvement deepens the ecosystem lock-in, signaling that your data, apps, and AI experiences all run best (and often only) on Apple’s closed architecture. While competitors chase OpenAI models, Apple monetizes privacy and exclusivity. 

Turning Convenience into Captivity 

Apple is framing this on-device AI feature as a privacy value addition, but it masks a deeper strategic intent. When AI models run exclusively on Apple’s silicon, users can’t easily migrate their data, workflows without losing the integrated intelligence that powers them.  

The 16-core Neural Engine isn’t just about faster computation; it’s about retention through dependency. While rivals like Google and Microsoft rely on cloud-based AI that runs across multiple devices, Apple’s fully local approach ensures that your AI-assisted photos, documents, and creative tools remain tied to macOS and iOS only. 

Performativity, Not Performance 

Apple’s benchmarks always optimize for scenarios showcasing their architecture’s strengths while downplaying weaknesses. The much touted 15% CPU and 30% GPU gains may sound substantial in the hindsight, until you recognize that they’re just incremental steps from the M4,  not the kind of giant leaps that Apple’s marketing team implies. 

Similarly, The 45% ray tracing improvement matters primarily for gaming, a market where Apple has historically suffered due to limited game library and developer support. Flagposting graphics performance for a gaming ecosystem that barely exists reveals marketing desperation. 

These numbers serve as narrative tools rather than user benchmarks, designed to sustain the perception of relentless progress even when real-world impact remains modest. 

Green Claims Missing The Mark

Apple claims that the M5 chip is energy efficient and would be completely carbon-neutral by 2030. That sounds promising, but what about the process? Making these chips is extremely energy-intensive and uses rare materials. Saving power while using the device, does not cut for the environmental cost of making it. 

Its classic “greenwashing”, market your product as environment friendly while hiding the resource exploitation, environment cost, and capitalistic practice that took place while making it. 

Apple’s frequent upgrade cycles and software-driven obsolescence mean that real-world energy efficiency is minimal, and making tall claims about it is nothing but mere optics. 

By enabling advanced AI processing entirely on-device, Apple is reinforcing eco-system lock-in. In practice, the M5’s innovations serve Apple’s marketing strategy more than users’ needs.  It also highlights a broader tech trend, that innovation and retention intersect, and consumer choice is defined by proprietary advantage rather than open choice.